Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Powers v. Epps et al
as 4:2010cv00057
Plaintiff:
Stephen Elliott Powers
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Lawrence Kelly, John Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Edwards et al
as 3:2010cv00029
Plaintiff:
Lee Dell Smith
Defendant:
Ira Edwards, James Burke, F Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Burke et al
as 4:2009cv00113
Plaintiff:
Joseph Felix Brown
Defendant:
James Burke, Faye Noel and Robert Sturdivant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stafford v. Kelly et al
as 4:2009cv00133
Plaintiff:
Roy Stafford
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly, Emitt L. Sparkman, Gloria Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Perry et al
as 4:2008cv00133
Petitioner:
Kevin Russell
Defendant:
Gloria Perry, Thomas M. Leman, Dom Trinca and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Burks v. Caldwell
as 08-30835
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES BURKS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES DAVID CALDWELL, Attorney General for the State of Louisiana
Burks v. Caldwell
as 3:2008cv00373
Plaintiff:
James Burks
Defendant:
James D. Caldwell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Terrance Burke v. Michael Martel, et al
as 08-16187
Petitioner - Appellant:
TERRANCE JAMES BURKE
Respondent - Appellee:
RICHARD SUBIA, acting Warden, Mule Creek State Prison and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Respondent:
MICHAEL MARTEL, acting Warden, Mule Creek State Prison
Burks v. Post Office et al
as 3:2008cv00030
Plaintiff:
James Burks
Defendant:
US Post Office and State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. CORPORATE MUNICIPAL MIAMI-DADE COUNTY COMMISSION et al
as 1:2007cv00566
Plaintiff:
HARRY H. BROWN
Defendant:
CORPORATE MUNICIPAL MIAMI-DADE COUNTY COMMISSION, JOSEPH P. FARINA, DAVID MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
