Cases 1 - 10 of 10
CRUTCHFIELD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23487
Plaintiff:
DAVID JAMES CRUTCHFIELD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRUTCHFIELD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22662
Plaintiff:
DAVID JAMES CRUTCHFIELD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRUTCHFIELD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv03517
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID JAMES CRUTCHFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crutchfield et al v. Rick Hill Nissan Inc
as 3:2012cv00183
Plaintiff:
Debbie Crutchfield and James Crutchfield
Defendant:
Rick Hill Nissan Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Crutchfield et al v. Rick Hill Nissan Inc
as 3:2012cv00180
Plaintiff:
Debbie Crutchfield and James Crutchfield
Defendant:
Rick Hill Nissan Inc
Counter_claimant:
Rick Hill Nissan Inc
Counter_defendant:
Debbie Crutchfield and James Crutchfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James Crutchfield v. Westinghouse Electric Corporatio, et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-82364
Plaintiff:
James Crutchfield
Defendant:
Westinghouse Electric Corporatio
CRUTCHFIELD v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv82364
Plaintiff:
JAMES CRUTCHFIELD
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, ABER INSULATION, ABNEY MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Crutchfield v. ConAgra Foods Inc
as 1:2008cv01809
Plaintiff:
James Crutchfield
Defendant:
Conagra Foods Inc and Conagra Foods Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Crutchfield v. ConAgra Foods Inc
as 5:2008cv00309
Plaintiff:
James Crutchfield
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Crutchfield v. City of New York et al
as 1:2007cv04693
Plaintiff:
James Crutchfield
Defendant:
City of New York and Winston Favis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
