Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Curry v. Madison County Detention Center et al
as 3:2021cv00690
Plaintiff:
James Curry, Jr.
Defendant:
Madison County Detention Center, Nurse Evan, Nurse Lori and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry, Jr. v. McCalla
as 3:2021cv00624
Plaintiff:
James Curry, Jr.
Defendant:
Meghan M. McCalla
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry, Jr. v. Madison County Detention Center
as 3:2021cv00623
Plaintiff:
James Curry, Jr.
Defendant:
Madison County Detention Center
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURRIE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv15545
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES CURRIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morale Patch Armory LLC v. Does 1-281, As Identified in Exhibit 2
as 1:2020cv04776
Defendant:
Does 1-281, As Identified in Exhibit 2, militarypatch, coldwar_p and others
Plaintiff:
Morale Patch Armory LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Curry, Jr. v. MDOC
as 4:2020cv00125
Defendant:
MDOC
Plaintiff:
James Curry, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CURRY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv05470
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMES CURRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curry v. B & B (WPB) LLC et al
as 9:2020cv80809
Defendant:
B & B (WPB) LLC and Mark Meisels
Plaintiff:
James Curry
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704
CURRY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv82738
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES CURRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curry et al v. Ducey et al
as 2:2019cv02549
Plaintiff:
Jodi Leisberg and James Curry
Defendant:
Gregory McKay, Mark Brnovich, Tom Stubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
