Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
James Nanney v. David Boyle
as 23-6852
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES DAVID NANNEY
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID BOYLE, Counsel of Record
Nanney v. Boyle We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00171
Plaintiff: James David Nanney
Defendant: David Boyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
James Nanney v. Erik Hooks
as 22-6834
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES DAVID NANNEY
Defendant / Appellee: ERIK A. HOOKS
Nanney v. Hooks We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00215
Plaintiff: James David Nanney
Defendant: Eric A. Hooks and Erik A. Hooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Nanney v. Ace Check Cashing We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv01424
Plaintiff: Mr. James David Nanney and James David Nanney
Defendant: Ace Check Cashing, Ronald L. Moore, JPay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nanney v. State of North Carolina We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00273
Petitioner: James David Nanney
Respondent: State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nanney v. Bank of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00206
Plaintiff: James David Nanney
Defendant: Bank of America and Donald S. Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NANNEY v. LEWIS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01432
Petitioner: JAMES DAVID NANNEY
Respondent: ROBERT C. LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NANNEY v. RBC MINISTRIES We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00315
Plaintiff: JAMES DAVID NANNEY
Defendant: RBC MINISTRIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nanney v. Bank of America Columbia SC
as 3:2008cv01838
Plaintiff: James David Nanney
Defendant: Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?