Cases 41 - 50 of 102
James Morrison v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 18-50563
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES DAVIS MORRISON
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morrison v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2017cv01290
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
James Davis Morrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morrison v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2017cv00246
Petitioner:
James Davis Morrison
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Paris et al v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co et al
as 2:2017cv01247
Plaintiff:
Jarob Lee Paris and Nicole C Paris
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Co , Willie James Davis and Hughes Timber Co L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00626
Plaintiff:
James Davis
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rhondy Davis, Sr. v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-51327
Petitioner - Appellant:
RHONDY JAMES DAVIS, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Davis v. Ortiz et al
as 5:2016cv00114
Plaintiff:
James Davis
Respondent:
UP Ortiz, UP Reimer, Sharla Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. McClure et al
as 5:2016cv00107
Plaintiff:
James Davis
Respondent:
FNU McClure, FNU Shotwell and Norma Trevino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Ortiz et al Transferred to ND/TX, Lubbock Division
as 1:2016cv00176
Plaintiff:
James Davis
Defendant:
UP Ortiz, UP Reimer, Sharla Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
