Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Olandio Workman v. State of South Carolina
as 19-6415
Defendant / Appellee:
GARRETT CHARLES RALPH, WILLIAM WALTER WILKINS, III, ROBERT PERRY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OLANDIO RAY WORKMAN
Workman v. State of South Carolina et al
as 6:2018cv03472
Defendant:
Sttorney General SC, Will Lewis, James E Hudson and others
Plaintiff:
Olandio Workman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Workman v. Perry et al
as 6:2018cv01331
Plaintiff:
Olandio Ray Workman
Defendant:
Robert Perry, James E Hudson, Will Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. White et al
as 6:2017cv02695
Defendant:
Henry J Mimms, John Vandermosten, Robert F Simm and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Reid, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Workman v. Perry et al
as 6:2017cv00765
Plaintiff:
Olandio Ray Workman
Defendant:
Robert Joseph Perry, James E Hudson, Christopher Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Hudson
as 2:2013cv00273
Plaintiff:
William Eugene Davis
Defendant:
James E. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hudson et al v. Empire State Carpenters Annuity Fund
as 1:2011cv12134
Plaintiff:
James E. Hudson and Fay E. Hudson
Defendant:
Empire State Carpenters Annuity Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Anderson v. Cagle et al
as 2:2010cv02697
Plaintiff:
Harold Anderson
Defendant:
Dianne D Cagle, Dianna Lewis, Scotty Bodiford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Miller et al
as 9:2008cv00743
Plaintiff:
Harold Anderson
Defendant:
Edward W Miller, Paul B Wickensimer, Allen Fretwell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hudson et al v. Empire State Carpenters Fringe Benefit Fund
as 1:2007cv11494
Plaintiff:
James E. Hudson and Fay E. Hudson
Defendant:
Empire State Carpenters Fringe Benefit Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
