Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Andrew Moret v. State of Oregon, et al
as 22-35037
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW GUY MORET
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON, OSH, CINDY B. and others
Moret v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2021cv00477
Defendant:
Channing Bennett, State of Oregon, James Egan and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Moret
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stacy v. Egan et al
as 6:2018cv03192
Plaintiff:
Michael Stacy
Defendant:
James Egan, Rod Hackathorn and Christ Hadley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Egan, Sr. v. Neil Horn
as 15-7381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD JAMES EGAN, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. NEIL ANDERSON HORN, VIRGINIA STATE BAR, Lawyer licensing official and DAVID J. JOHNSON, Executive Director Virginia Independent Defense Commission
Edward Egan, Sr. v. D. Barnhill
as 15-7382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD JAMES EGAN, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
D. STAN BARNHILL, Attorney at Law, TIMES-WORLD CORPORATION, Owners/Publishers, THE ROANOKE TIMES, Newspaper Company and others
Edward Egan, Sr. v. Kevin Gick
as 15-7359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD JAMES EGAN, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN GICK, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney and UNKNOWN SUPERVISOR, Commonwealth Attorney for Roanoke County VA
Egan v. Bornhill, et al
as 2:2015cv00136
Plaintiff:
Edward James Egan
Defendant:
D. Stan Bornhill, Times-World Corporation, The Roanoke Times and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Egan v. Horn, et al
as 2:2015cv00076
Plaintiff:
Edward James Egan
Defendant:
Mr. Neil Horn, Virginia State Bar and David J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Egan v. Gick et al
as 2:2015cv00056
Plaintiff:
Edward James Egan
Defendant:
Kevin Gick and Unknown Supervisor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chilson v. Egan et al
as 6:2014cv03254
Plaintiff:
Adam Joseph Chilson
Defendant:
James Egan and Rod Hackathorn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
