Cases 21 - 30 of 177
Fisher #669166 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2022cv00671
Plaintiff:
Michael James Fisher #669166
Defendant:
R. Rewerts, K. Nevins, Unknown Wireman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven Ables et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04955
Plaintiff:
Steven Ables, Zechariah Adams, Steven Aguado and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Fisher v. Orange Park Med. Ctr
as 3:2022cv00686
Plaintiff:
James Fisher
Defendant:
Orange Park Med. Ctr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ables et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00758
Plaintiff:
Ables, Steven Ables, Zechariah Adams and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Ables et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00758
Plaintiff:
Steven Ables, Steven Aguado, Jonathan Alexander and others
Defendant:
Zechariah Adams and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
FISHER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06460
Plaintiff:
JAMES FISHER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fisher v. Columbia Correctional Institution
as 3:2022cv00504
Plaintiff:
James Fisher
Defendant:
Columbia Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. State of Florida et al
as 3:2022cv00488
Plaintiff:
James Fisher
Defendant:
State of Florida, Mark Mahon and All Duval Judges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE et al
as 1:2022cv00962
Plaintiff:
TOBIAS JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, JAMES FISHER and HOLLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Fisher v. Fahlgren
as 3:2022cv00389
Plaintiff:
James Fisher
Defendant:
Judge Steven M. Fahlgren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
