Cases 1 - 10 of 18
DAVIS v. DOE et al
as 2:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DAVIS
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE 1-9, LINDA ROSENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HARDY v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2022cv04419
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HARDY
Defendant:
THEODORE W JOHNSON, KHADIJA T DIGGS, LEO L DUNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CICCOTELLI v. GENMARK DIAGNOSTICS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01626
Defendant:
GERONIMO ACQUISITION CORP., JAMES FOX, LISA GILES and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Franchi v. GenMark Diagnostics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00496
Defendant:
GenMark Diagnostics, Inc., James Fox, Lisa M. Giles and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Franchi
Mancini v. GenMark Diagnostics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00466
Defendant:
James Fox, Lisa Giles, Roche Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Mancini
Stein v. GenMark Diagnostics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00454
Defendant:
GenMark Diagnostics, Inc., Lisa Giles, James Fox and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
FOX et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv16198
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
JAMES FOX and MELINDA FOX
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOX v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2016cv01681
Plaintiff:
JAMES FOX
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
FORTUNE et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC. et al
as 2:2013cv05879
Plaintiff:
RONALD FORTUNE , MICHAEL HALL , MARY CLAYBORN and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC. and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROTHERS v. CORBETT et al
as 2:2013cv01154
Plaintiff:
WILLIAMS B. BROTHERS, JR.
Defendant:
TOM CORBETT, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
