Cases 1 - 10 of 12
DAVIS v. DOE et al
as 2:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DAVIS
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE 1-9, LINDA ROSENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HARDY v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2022cv04419
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HARDY
Defendant:
THEODORE W JOHNSON, KHADIJA T DIGGS, LEO L DUNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CICCOTELLI v. GENMARK DIAGNOSTICS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01626
Defendant:
GERONIMO ACQUISITION CORP., JAMES FOX, LISA GILES and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
FOX v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2016cv01681
Plaintiff:
JAMES FOX
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
FORTUNE et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC. et al
as 2:2013cv05879
Plaintiff:
RONALD FORTUNE , MICHAEL HALL , MARY CLAYBORN and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC. and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROTHERS v. CORBETT et al
as 2:2013cv01154
Plaintiff:
WILLIAMS B. BROTHERS, JR.
Defendant:
TOM CORBETT, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Bricker v. Campano et al
as 1:2011cv02372
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Bricker
Defendant:
Dominic F. Campano, John or Jane Doe Supervisor over COMPANO, Christopher Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ANDERSON v. BEARD et al
as 2:2010cv05604
Plaintiff:
JOSH LEE ANDERSON
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, JOSEPH J. PIAZZA, DAVID A. VARANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOX v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE INC. et al
as 2:2010cv01895
Plaintiff:
JAMES FOX
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE INC. and GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
