Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
King v. New York State et al
as 2:2023cv03421
Plaintiff:
Cecil Roy King
Defendant:
New York State, James Francis Mathews, William B. Rebolini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Donnell v. Ephrata Police Department et al
as 5:2023cv01755
Plaintiff:
James Francis O'Donnell, Jr.
Defendant:
Ephrata Police Department, LANCASTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Officer David Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Donnell v. Ephrata Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
James Francis O'Donnell, Jr.
Defendant:
Ephrata Police Department, Lancaster City Police Department, Officer David Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STOCH v. CITY OF CHICAGO et al
as 1:2022cv04231
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STOCH
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, D. SANCHEZ, JAMES FRANCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. Savage
as 5:2021cv05108
Plaintiff:
James Francis Kelly
Defendant:
Michael Savage, Josh Crane and Jess Brian McKinzie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00219
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed
James Johnston v. Scott Johnson
as 17-35137
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMES FRANCIS JOHNSTON
Defendant - Appellant:
SCOTT HOWARD JOHNSON, Dr.
Johnston v. Johnson
as 6:2016cv01894
Defendant:
Dr. Scott Howard Johnson
Plaintiff:
James Francis Johnston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. NORTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT d/b/a BROWARD HEALTH et al
as 0:2014cv61821
Plaintiff:
Elesema Gonzalez
Defendant:
NORTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT d/b/a BROWARD HEALTH , Dexter Dore , Christopher Pitts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
