Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Joseph Shine-Johnson, et al v. Mike DeWine, et al
as 23-3861
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH T. SHINE-JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
RUBIN WILLIAMS, ANTONIO HENDERSON, JARRON EARLEY-TABOR, SR. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE DEWINE, AMY ACTON, ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH and others
Shine-Johnson et al v. Mike Dewine et al
as 2:2020cv05919
Defendant:
Ernie Moore, Joseph Murphy, UMC Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
James Goodson, Richardo Taborn, Bobby Nix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. DeWine et al
as 2:2020cv03301
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitations and Corrections and Mike DeWine
Plaintiff:
Rubin Williams, James Goodson, Anthony Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones et al v. DeWine et al
as 5:2020cv00981
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitations and Corrections and Governor Mike DeWine
Plaintiff:
Rubin Williams, James Goodson, Anthony Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goodson v. Finefair Supermarket
as 1:2018cv04701
Plaintiff:
James Goodson
Defendant:
Finefair Supermarket
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Vargas v. Amber Howell, et al
as 18-15513
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL VARGAS
Defendant - Appellee:
AMBER HOWELL, STEVE MCBRIDE, RICHARD GLOECKNER and others
Goodson v. Doe et al
as 6:2017cv06225
Plaintiff:
Antonio James Goodson
Defendant:
John Doe and Monroe County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans with Disabilities Act
Goodson v. Rivemiua
as 1:2012cv05683
Petitioner:
James Goodson
Respondent:
Rivemiua
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Goodson v. Morganthau et al
as 1:2010cv02179
Plaintiff:
James Goodson
Defendant:
Robert Morganthau, Jason Bertrand, Presiding Judge of Manhattan Criminal Part 5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
