Cases 1 - 10 of 12
USA v. James Hampton
as 13-30052
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES HAMPTON
The Hampton Company National Surety, LLC et al v. Byrd et al
as 1:2012cv00370
Plaintiff:
The Hampton Company National Surety, LLC , A-24/7 Bail Bonds , Joseph Nievies Cantu, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Mike Byrd and Jackson County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adcock et al v. Gardner et al
as 4:2012cv00118
Plaintiff:
Aaron Mitchell Adcock and Ronald E. Adcock
Defendant:
James Hampton Gardner , The Hampton Company National Surety, LLC and Bankers Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00856
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011mc00250
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Hampton v. Louisiana State Penitentiary
as 5:2010cv00990
Plaintiff:
Rufus James Hampton, III
Defendant:
Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hampton et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 2:2009cv00313
Plaintiff:
James Hampton, James Hampton, Beverly Hampton and others
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hampton v. Wilkinson
as 08-31014
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES HAMPTON
Respondent - Appellee:
TIM WILKINSON, Warden
USA v. Hampton
as 08-30895
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES HAMPTON
Hampton v. Wilkinson et al
as 2:2008cv01535
Plaintiff:
James Hampton
Defendant:
Tim Wilkinson
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
