Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Harrell v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02794
Plaintiff:
Robert James Harrell, Jr
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
James Harrell v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv07006
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James Harrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HARRELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv08010
Plaintiff:
JAMES HARRELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael HarrellIn re: Michael Harrell
as 23-11634
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL JAMES HARRELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HARRELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16916
Plaintiff:
JAMES HARRELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harrell, Jr. v. Leal et al
as 5:2021cv00049
Defendant:
Darious D. King and Ashley N. Leal
Plaintiff:
James Harrell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller et al v. Harrell et al
as 4:2020cv03160
Defendant:
Timothy James Harrell and 7-HILLS TRANSPORT, INC.
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas Miller and Michael Ian Ward Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
McCutcheon et al v. Outdoors RV Manufacturing, Inc.
as 2:2020at00884
Defendant:
Outdoors RV Manufacturing, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Harrell McCutcheon and brenda mccutcheon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCutcheon v. Outdoors RV Manufacturing, Inc. et al
as 2:2020at00883
Plaintiff:
James Harrell McCutcheon
Defendant:
brenda mccutcheon and Outdoors RV Manufacturing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCutcheon et al v. Outdoors RV Manufacturing, Inc.
as 2:2020at00882
Defendant:
Outdoors RV Manufacturing, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Harrell McCutcheon and brenda mccutcheon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
