Cases 11 - 20 of 104
Chicago Joe's Tea Room, LLC, et al v. Village of Broadview, et al
as 22-3194
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHICAGO JOE'S TEA ROOM, LLC and PERVIS CONWAY, individually
Defendant / Appellee:
VILLAGE OF BROADVIEW, an Illinois Municipal Corporation, HENRY VICENIK, FITZGERALD MULLINS and others
Davis v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq01759
Plaintiff:
James Johnson, Jr. and Effie Davis
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Chevron USA, Inc.
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James Johnson v. Ghaliah Obaisi, et al
as 22-1620
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GHALIAH OBAISI, as independent Executor of the Estate of DR. SALEH OBAISI, ARTHUR FUNK, Doctor, NICOLETTE DUFFIELD, Medical Administrator and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Johnson v. IDOC et al
as 3:2021cv00450
Defendant:
Devin E. Sullens, John Doe and IDOC
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Litherland et al
as 3:2021cv00449
Defendant:
Steven Meeks, Jane Doe 1, Dr. Litherland and others
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leventhal v. Johnson
as 2:2021cv00507
Petitioner:
Howard E Leventhal
Respondent:
James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Kahl et al
as 3:2020cv03335
Defendant:
Mary Dambacher, Jennifer Watson, Macoupin County State of Illinois and others
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Kahl et al
as 3:2020cv01338
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Mary Dambacher, Jennifer Watson and others
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv01441
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JAMES JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
