Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Corbett v. Cummings et al
as 1:2023cv10278
Plaintiff:
James M Corbett
Defendant:
James M. Cummings, Emily Moldoff, Doctor Durfee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Cummings et al
as 1:2021cv10124
Defendant:
Montigny, David Cahoon, James M. Cummings and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas M Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tavares v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 20-1172
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL D. TAVARES
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES M. CUMMINGS and COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Martinez v. Cummings et al
as 1:2017cv10539
Plaintiff:
Abdul Malik Martinez
Defendant:
James M. Cummings, John Rogerzenski, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silva v. Cummings et al
as 1:2014cv10372
Plaintiff:
Mark Silva
Defendant:
James M. Cummings, Michael Regan, Thomas Driscoll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melanson v. Barnstable County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2012cv10687
Plaintiff:
Kyle Melanson
Defendant:
Barnstable County Sheriff's Department, James M Cummings, Patrick W Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatch v. Lappin, et al
as 09-2361
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD H. HATCH
Respondent - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN and JAMES M. CUMMINGS
Cruz v. Cummings et al
as 1:2009cv11563
Plaintiff:
Lara Manuel Cruz
Defendant:
James M. Cummings and Sheriff and Several Other Unknown Medical and Correction Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hatch v. Lappin et al
as 1:2009cv11490
Respondent:
Harley G. Lappin and James M. Cummings
Petitioner:
Richard Hatch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CUMMINGS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2009cv00391
Plaintiff:
JAMES M CUMMINGS
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
