Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Wabuyabo v. Kansas Department for Children and Families et al
as 5:2017cv03207
Plaintiff:
Boniface W. Wabuyabo
Defendant:
Kansas Department for Children and Families, Rose Aliuba, James McMillian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONNELLY v. SELLERS et al
as 5:2017cv00416
Plaintiff:
PATRICK LEE CONNELLY
Defendant:
ERIC SELLERS, BRUCE CHATMAN, MICHAEL CANNON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCOY v. CHATMAN et al
as 5:2015cv00175
Plaintiff:
RICKY BERNARD MCCOY
Defendant:
BRUCE CHATMAN, JOHN AND OR JANE DOE, EDWARD FOWLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Departme, et al
as 14-11571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT JONES, WARDEN and others
McMillian v. Newman et al
as 1:2013cv00518
Plaintiff:
James McMillian
Defendant:
Mitchell Newman and Marcus Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON v. HUMPHREY et al
as 5:2012cv00128
Plaintiff:
TREMAYNE WATSON
Defendant:
CARL HUMPHREY, JUNE BISHOP and JAMES MCMILLIAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATKINS v. HUMPHREY et al
as 5:2012cv00118
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WATKINS
Defendant:
CARL HUMPHREY, JUNE BISHOP and JAMES MCMILLIAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCIVER v. HUMPHREY et al
as 5:2012cv00119
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN MCIVER
Defendant:
CARL HUMPHREY, JUNE BISHOP and JAMES MCMILLIAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Chubb v. MDOC, et al
as 09-1952
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT J. CHUBB
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PATRICIA CARUSO, Warden, BLAINE LAFLER, Warden, named as "B. Lafler" and others
Garrison #237608 v. Palmer et al
as 1:2009cv00023
Petitioner:
Michael Garrison #237608
Respondent:
Carmen Palmer, Michigan Parole Board, James Atterberry and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
