Cases 1 - 10 of 51
James Dubrock v. Superintendent Somerset SCI, et al
as 23-2536
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MICHAEL DUBROCK
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY JEFFERSON COUNTY
WOLTER v. AGNEW et al
as 2:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A WOLTER
Defendant:
TRACEY ANNE AGNEW and JAMES MICHAEL DONNELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
AMOR et al v. CONOVER
as 2:2021cv05574
Plaintiff:
DR. JAMES MICHAEL AMOR and PATRICIA ELVIRA AMOR
Defendant:
COURTNEY CONOVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AMOR et al v. CONOVER
as 5:2021cv05574
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL AMOR and PATRICIA ELVIRA AMOR
Defendant:
COURTNEY CONOVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUBROCK v. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI SOMERSET et al
as 2:2021cv00432
Petitioner:
JAMES MICHAEL DUBROCK
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI SOMERSET and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF JEFFERSON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WOLTER v. LOVETT et al
as 2:2020cv20341
Defendant:
TRACEY ANNE AGNEW, MICHAEL R LOVETT and JAMES MICHAEL DONNELLY
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A WOLTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CALT et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv20177
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE NEAL and JAMES MICHAEL CALT
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., MCKESSON CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CALT et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 3:2019cv11710
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE NEAL and JAMES MICHAEL CALT
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REIMER et al v. THE TRAVELERS HOME AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2018cv01808
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL REIMER , JOHN REIMER and HOPE REIMER
Defendant:
THE TRAVELERS HOME AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
