Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Lovelace v. McCracken County, Kentucky et al
as 5:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Corey A. Lovelace and Corey A. Thorson
Defendant:
McCracken County, Kentucky, Matt Carter, Ryan Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rudavsky v. City of South Burlington et al
as 2:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rudavsky
Defendant:
South Burlington, City of , Christopher Bataille , Patrick Mulcahy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James Mills v. City of Covina, et al
as 17-56343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MILLS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF COVINA, a California municipal corporation, KIM RANEY, in his official capacity as the Chief of the City of Covina Police Department, TERRANCE HANOU, Officer and others
James Mills v. City of Covina et al
as 2:2016cv07127
Defendant:
City of Covina, Does, Terrance Hanou and others
Plaintiff:
James Mills
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv11833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Boatwright v. Mills et al
as 5:2012cv01574
Plaintiff:
Meshiha Boatwright
Defendant:
James Mills and City of Syracuse
Cross_claimant:
City of Syracuse
Cross_defendant:
James Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washburn v. Love et al
as 2:2010cv00246
Plaintiff:
Arthur Washburn
Defendant:
Will Love, Carl Mullens and James Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
