Cases 1 - 10 of 20
United States v. James Mitchell
as 23-2348
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
James Demon Mitchell, also known as James Mitchell, also known as Yola, also known as Gino
United States v. James Mitchell
as 22-1753
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
James Mitchell
Kellough et al v. Westgate Resorts, Ltd., L.P., et al
as 4:2020cv00711
Plaintiff:
James Acree, Kenner Nadermann, Barbara Bowsher and others
Defendant:
Westgate Resorts, Inc.,, Westgate Vacation Villas, LLC, Westgate GV Sales & Marketing, LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kellough et al v. Westgate Resorts, Ltd., L.P., et al
as 4:2020cv00707
Plaintiff:
james acree, Kenner Nadermann, barbara bowsher and others
Defendant:
Westgate Resorts, Inc.,, WESTGATE VACATION VILLAS, LLC, WESTGATE GV SALES & MARKETING, LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellis et al v. 3M Company et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2019cv02099
Plaintiff:
William DeCarlo, Christopher Morgan, Scott Passmore and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Aribuabo et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00475
Plaintiff:
Ira Horne, Michael Cosgrove, Dustin Price and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Technologies LLC and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. 3M Company
as 0:2018cv01515
Plaintiff:
James Mitchell
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. Polk County Jail
as 4:2017cv00393
Petitioner:
Oscar James Mitchell
Respondent:
Polk County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mitchell v. Poinsett County Sheriff Office
as 3:2017cv00236
Plaintiff:
James Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Cox et al
as 3:2017cv00131
Plaintiff:
James Mitchell
Defendant:
Susan Cox and Corizon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
