Cases 1 - 10 of 78
James DaileyIn re: James Dailey
as 24-13621
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES MONROE DAILEY
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Monroe v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv02146
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Ronnie James Monroe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARRISON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16450
Plaintiff:
JAMES MONROE HARRISON, III
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James Dailey v. Fleming, et al
as 23-12048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MONROE DAILEY
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. FLEMING, LT. SPADES and MS. BRYANT
Board of Trustees of the Employee Painters Trust et al v. Superior Windows & Glass Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00303
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Employee Painters' Trust, Board of Trustees of the Western Glaziers Retirement Fund, Board of Trustees of the District Council No. 5 Apprenticeship and Training Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Superior Windows & Glass, Inc., James Monroe Woodell, Does & Roes I-X and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
DAILEY v. CORRECT X PHARMACY et al
as 4:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
JAMES MONROE DAILEY
Defendant:
CORRECT X PHARMACY, Nurse GREY, Nurse JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James DaileyIn re: James Dailey
as 22-11503
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES MONROE DAILEY
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
DAILEY v. FLEMING et al
as 4:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
JAMES MONROE DAILEY
Defendant:
Mr FLEMING, Lieutenant JAMES, JANE DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02718
Plaintiff:
James Monroe Smith
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: James Baldwin
as 21-3004
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES MONROE BALDWIN
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
