Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Thomas Monroe v. State of Texas, et al
as 17-11329
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS JAMES MONROE
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF TEXAS, LUBBOCK PAROLE BOARD and LUBBOCK POLICE DEPARTMENT
Monroe v. State of Texas et al
as 5:2017cv00171
Plaintiff: Thomas James Monroe
Defendant: State of Texas, Lubbock Parole Board and Lubbock Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perrette v. Jackson County ADC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00102
Plaintiff: James Monroe Perrette
Defendant: Jackson County ADC, Unknown Splicer, Unknown Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crosson v. United States
as 1:2016cv00151
Defendant: United States
Plaintiff: James Monroe Crosson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: James Crosson, Jr.
as 16-10872
Movant: In re: JAMES MONROE CROSSON, JR.
Thomas Monroe v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-10178
Petitioner - Appellant: THOMAS JAMES MONROE
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Perrette v. Harrison County Adult Detention Center We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00055
Plaintiff: James Monroe Perrette
Defendant: Harrison County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kokesh et al v. Obama et al
as 6:2014cv00159
Defendant: John Adams, John Quincy Adams, Chester Alan Arthur and others
Plaintiff: Allen Gumby and Adam Kokesh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Monroe v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 12-10767
Petitioner - Appellant: THOMAS JAMES MONROE
Respondent - Appellee: RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
USA v. James Childre
as 12-60107
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES MONROE CHILDRESS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?