Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Cota v. Nabors et al
as 8:2020cv01330
Plaintiff:
Luis Alberto Cota
Defendant:
James Nabors and W. Galloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NABORS, JR. v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv05864
Plaintiff:
JAMES NABORS, JR.
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hook v. Nabors et al
as 8:2017cv01103
Plaintiff:
Thomas Manning Hook
Defendant:
James Nabors and Jerrice Wagnor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hook v. Grace et al
as 8:2017cv01098
Plaintiff:
Thomas Manning Hook
Defendant:
Eric Trumane Grace, Kevin Cole, David L. Langston Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Hook v. Polk County Sheriff's Departme, et al
as 16-15478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS MANNING HOOK
Defendant - Appellee:
POLK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, General Counsel/Legal Counsel, JAMES NABORS, Detention Lieutenant and JERRICE WAGNOR, Law Library Civilian Clerk
Hook v. Grace et al
as 8:2016cv01346
Plaintiff:
Thomas Manning Hook
Defendant:
Eric Trumane Grace, Kevin Cole, David L. Langston Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hook v. Polk County Sheriff's Department et al
as 8:2016cv01345
Plaintiff:
Thomas Manning Hook
Defendant:
Polk County Sheriff's Department, James Nabors and Jerrice Wagnor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClelland v. Polk County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 8:2014cv01971
Plaintiff:
Daryl J. McClelland
Defendant:
Polk County Board of County Commissioners, Grady Judd, Chief Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amos v. Judd et al
as 8:2014cv00051
Plaintiff:
Stephen R. Amos
Defendant:
Grady Judd, James Nabors, Tamara Pickles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
