Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hopkins v. Peters-Baker et al
as 4:2020cv00067
Plaintiff:
Nelson E Hopkins, SR
Defendant:
Jeffery L Bushur, Kelly Winship, Shaun Mackelprang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Reynolds et al
as 4:2018cv00320
Plaintiff:
Demetrious Johnson
Defendant:
James Reynolds , Brawley and Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Clayton County Sheriff's Department
as 4:2017cv02343
Plaintiff:
Michael James Reynolds, Jr.
Defendant:
Clayton County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Holiday et al
as 4:2017cv00392
Plaintiff:
Brian R Hughes
Defendant:
Doc Holiday , Carl L Johnson, Armart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Cancer Fund of America, Inc. et al
as 5:2015mc00034
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission , All Fifty States, Arkansas, State of and others
Defendant:
Cancer Fund of America, Inc., Cancer Support Services, Inc., Children's Cancer Fund of America, Inc. and others
Receiver:
Receivership Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Todd Luh v. Corey Farnsworth, et al
as 12-3422
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Todd James Luh
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Mary Attebury, Dr. James Reynolds and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Corey f Farnsworth, Brigette Rose, Tyler Chavez and others
Todd Luh v. State of Missouri, et al
as 10-2539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Todd James Luh
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Missouri, Mary Attebury, Dr. James Reynolds and others
Todd Luh v. State of Missouri, et al
as 09-1342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Todd James Luh
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Missouri, Mary Attebury, Dr. James Reynolds and others
Luh v. Missouri, State of et al
as 5:2008cv06088
Plaintiff:
Todd James Luh
Defendant:
Missouri, State of, Mary Attebury, James Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
