Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Roberts v. Brown et al
as 7:2011cv03188
Plaintiff:
Thomas James Roberts
Defendant:
Kyle Brown, Harold Hughston, Jr., Phillip Bowling and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Price et al
as 3:2010cv00750
Petitioner:
Thomas James Roberts
Respondent:
C Price and Attorney General for the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roberts v. Price et al
as 3:2011cv00750
Petitioner:
Thomas James Roberts
Respondent:
C Price and Attorney General for the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roberts v. Mitchem et al
as 3:2009cv00517
Petitioner:
Thomas James Roberts
Respondent:
Billy Mitchem and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Taylor v. Price et al
as 5:2008cv02246
Petitioner:
James Robert Taylor
Respondent:
Cheryl Price and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williamson v. St. Clair County Commission
as 4:2008cv01253
Plaintiff:
Paul Williamson, Sr
Defendant:
St. Clair County Commission, Stanley D Batmon, Michael Bowling and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Loggins v. Equifirst Corporation et al
as 4:2008cv00614
Plaintiff:
James Robert Loggins
Defendant:
Equifirst Corporation, Equifirst Corporation, Homecomings Financial, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
West v. Sconyers et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2008cv00082
Plaintiff:
James Robert West, Jr.
Defendant:
Captain Sconyers, Shawn Logan, Gerald Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pope et al v. McKoon et al
as 3:2008cv00073
Plaintiff:
John Pope and Janet Pope
Defendant:
James Robert McKoon, Jr. and McKoon, Thomas and McKoon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
West v. Gavins et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2007cv00747
Plaintiff:
James Robert West, Jr.
Defendant:
Bryan Gavins and Law Library Supervisor
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
