Cases 71 - 80 of 230
RONQUEST v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2016cv01634
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROGER RONQUEST
Defendant:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DAVID LEACH, ANTHONY FOXX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galusha et al v. Rogers et al
as 2:2016cv00345
Plaintiff:
Judi Galusha and Reginald Galusha
Defendant:
James Rogers and Jessica Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carol Saltzman v. James Rogers, Warden
as 16-30839
Petitioner - Appellant:
CAROL SALTZMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES ROGERS, WARDEN, LOUISIANA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN
Ronquest v. Newton et al
as 5:2016ct03179
Plaintiff:
James Roger Ronquest
Defendant:
S. Newton, S. Moss, David C. Leach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheila Hamilton v. James Rogers, Warden
as 16-30494
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHEILA HAMILTON
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES ROGERS, WARDEN, LOUISIANA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN
Martin v. Rogers et al
as 2:2016cv03297
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Lee Marie Martin
Defendant:
James Rogers
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers et al v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as MOE/4:16-cv-00484
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development, LLC , Janssen Ortho LLC , Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
James Rogers , Netty Acker , Bernard Arrington and others
Rogers et al v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00484
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development, LLC , Janssen Ortho LLC , Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
James Rogers , Netty Acker , Bernard Arrington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Passaniti v. Rogers
as 5:2016cv00281
Plaintiff:
Linda Kate Keeney Passaniti
Defendant:
James Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Onnie Mack v. James Rogers, Warden
as 16-30119
Petitioner - Appellant:
ONNIE MACK
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES ROGERS, WARDEN, LOUISIANA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
