Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Rogers v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2024cv04071
Petitioner:
James Rogers
Respondent:
State of South Dakota, Kellie Wasko and Teresa Bittinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3669
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Roberts v. Gutierrez et al
as 4:2023cv05149
Plaintiff:
Joseph J Roberts, Jr and Joe JW Roberts, Jr
Defendant:
Crystal Gutierrez, James Kent, Mark McClanahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04182
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Roberts v. Gutierrez et al
as 2:2023cv01377
Plaintiff:
Joseph J Roberts, Jr and Joe JW Roberts, Jr
Defendant:
Crystal Gutierrez, James Kent, Mark McClanahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Brown v. Cheryl Strange, et al
as 23-35145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY TYREE BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
CHERYL STRANGE, Secretary of Corrections, STEPHEN SINCLAIR, in their individual and official capacities, SCOTT J. RUSSEL, Deputy Secretary of Corrections and others
Brown v. Strange et al
as 4:2022cv05094
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyree Brown
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Stephen Sinclair, Scott Russel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROGERS v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2021cv00335
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
LARRY GRANT JAMES ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. USA
as 3:2020cv01950
Petitioner:
Karl James Rogers and Karl J. Rogers
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rogers v. USA
as 2:2020cv03640
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
