Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH et al v. WASHINGTON AREA HUMANE SOCIETY et al
as 2:2019cv01672
Defendant:
GLEN THOMSON, WASHINGTON AREA HUMANE SOCIETY, GENE KARCH and others
Plaintiff:
SALLY SMITH, JAMES SMITH, ANTOINETTE MACZKO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELLA CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. CITY OF MONESSEN et al
as 2:2019cv00390
Plaintiff:
BELLA CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Defendant:
CITY OF MONESSEN and JAMES SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv15810
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GASS v. MATTHEWS et al
as 2:2018cv02360
Plaintiff:
JERMAU GASS
Defendant:
ALVIN MATTHEWS, LORENDA HILL, CHERYL HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. LIT SINGER et al
as 3:2017cv00240
Plaintiff:
JAMES SMITH
Defendant:
LIT SINGER and TAMMY FURGONSIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rayco Saunders v. GFS Entertainment Group LLC, et al
as 17-3767
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYCO SAUNDERS
Defendant:
GFS ENTERTAINMENT GROUP LLC, DC BOXING AND WRESTLING COMMISSION, SHELDON J. BROWN, DC Boxing and Wrestling Dept. Commissioner and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
SAUNDERS v. GFS ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01062
Plaintiff:
RAYCO SAUNDERS
Defendant:
GFS ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LLC, DC BOXING AND WRESTLING COMMISSION, SHELDON J. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
