Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Vernon v. Deramus et al
as 2:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Michael Chad Vernon
Defendant:
Deramus, Bohackle, Jude Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dejoy
as 6:2023cv02265
Plaintiff:
Andrew Smith and Andrew James Smith
Defendant:
Postmaster General Louis Dejoy and Louis Dejoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
James Fountain v. Raymond Peterson, et al
as 22-13672
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAMES DEAN FOUNTAIN
Defendant / Appellant:
RAYMOND PETERSON, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Sheriff of the Clinch County Sheriffs Office and JAMES SMITH
FOUNTAIN v. CLINCH COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 7:2021cv00120
Plaintiff:
JAMES DEAN FOUNTAIN
Defendant:
CLINCH COUNTY GEORGIA, SHERIFF RAYMOND PETERSON, DEPUTY JAMES SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Jackson Hospital (MAG+)
as 2:2021cv00092
Plaintiff:
Peter James Smith
Defendant:
Jackson Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Restaurant Brands International Inc. et al (MAG+)
as 2:2021cv00084
Defendant:
Burger King and Restaurant Brands International Inc.
Plaintiff:
Peter James Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Walmart Inc. et al (MAG+)
as 2:2020cv00406
Defendant:
Walmart Store #00938 and Walmart Inc.
Plaintiff:
Peter James Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Regions Bank Inc. et al (MAG+)
as 2:2019cv00213
Defendant:
Regions Bank Inc. and Regions Bank
Plaintiff:
Peter James Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Walmart Stores, Inc. et al (MAG+)
as 2:2019cv00089
Defendant:
Walmart Store #05348 and Walmart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Peter James Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATEL v. LANIER COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 7:2017cv00085
Plaintiff:
NILESH S PATEL
Defendant:
LANIER COUNTY GEORGIA, CHARLES NICK NORTON and JAMES SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
