Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1662
Plaintiff:
Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Akil Sachveda and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ibrahim Turkmen, Akhil Sachdeva, Anser Mehmood and others
Defendant - Appellee:
John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor:
Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1002
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor:
Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael Zenk, Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-999
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor:
Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant:
James Sherman
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1003
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor:
Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Salvatore LoPresti, MDC Captain
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-981
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor:
Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Warden Dennis Hasty, former Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center(MDC), James Sherman, Michael Zenk, Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center and others
Jose Chavez, et al v. James Ziglar, et al
as 10-17659
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSE CHAVEZ, husband and MARIA ELENA CHAVEZ, wife
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES W. ZIGLAR, DAVID AGUILAR, RALPH HUNT and others
MIRMEHDI et al v. ASHCROFT et al
as 1:2007cv02031
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD MIRMEHDI, MOSTAFA MIRMEHDI, MOHSEN MIRMEHDI and others
Defendant:
JOHN ASHCROFT, JOHN ASHCROFT, ROBERT MUELLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez v. United States Department of Justice, Exec. Office for Immigration Review et al
as 3:2007cv00301
Petitioner:
Robert M. Martinez
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice, Exec. Office for Immigration Review, Alberto R. Gonzales, Kevin D. Rooney and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Deeb v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv00169
Plaintiff:
Hisham Deeb
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, James W Ziglar, George H Lund, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
