Cases 31 - 40 of 81
Walsh v. Buchanaan et al
as 3:2011cv01206
Plaintiff:
James Walsh
Defendant:
Mark Buchanaan, Raymond Castro, Carson Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doutel v. Norwalk, et al
as 3:2011cv01164
Plaintiff:
Barbara C. Doutel
Defendant:
City of Norwalk , Harry W. Rilling , Thomas Materra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina et al v. Fischer et al
as 1:2011cv00176
Plaintiff:
Anthony Medina, Peter Lopez, Paul Ford and others
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Lester L. Wright, MD., Carl J. Koenignmann, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Walsh
as 7:2011cv00044
Petitioner:
Eric Wade Clark
Respondent:
James Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark v. Walsh
as 1:2011cv00044
Petitioner:
Eric Wade Clark
Respondent:
James Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kinlaw v. Griffin et al
as 1:2010cv09142
Plaintiff:
Arthur Kinlaw
Defendant:
Patrick J. Griffin, James Walsh, Supt. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petronio v. Walsh
as 10-4549
Petitioner - Appellee:
Mark Petronio
Respondent - Appellant:
James Walsh, Superintendent, Sullivan Correctional Facility
National Organization for Marr v. Walsh
as 10-4572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
National Organization for Marriage, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
James Walsh, in his official capacity as co-chair of the New York State Board of Elections, Douglas Kellner, in his official capacity as co-chair of the New York State Board of Elections, Evelyn Aguila, in her official capacity as commissioner of the New York State Board of Elections and others
Cruz v. Walsh
as 9:2010cv01299
Petitioner:
Jose M. Cruz
Respondent:
James Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cruz v. Walsh
as 1:2010cv04809
Petitioner:
Jose M. Cruz
Respondent:
Warden James Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
