Cases 61 - 70 of 77
Hilgers-Luckey et al v. Depuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 2:2011cv02072
Plaintiff:
Erika Hilgers-Luckey , James . Williams , Martha Bing and others
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics Inc , Depuy Inc , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Williams
as 1:2010cv07277
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2009mc00077
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
DAWN DESIREE CUMMINGS, FAZIA DEEN-BACCHUS, LISA MARIE DIRIG and others
WILLIAMS v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY'S SUPERINTENDENT
as 2:2009cv00063
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Respondent:
PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY'S SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WILLIAMS v. BUSS et al
as 2:2009cv00059
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Defendant:
EDDIE G. BUSS, BRUCE LEMMON, ALISIA LAWRENCE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WILLIAMS v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2008cv00486
Petitioner:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Respondent:
PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Town of Cicero, The et al
as 1:2008cv07021
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
Town of Cicero, The, Officer Camacho and Officer Lema
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00308
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hernandez et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2008cv00054
Plaintiff:
Jaime Hernandez, Peter Nelson, Robert Sanderson and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Tom Kness, Paul Volpe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Williams v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2008cv00051
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
City of Chicago and Tom Kness
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
