Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Admiral Insurance Company v. Vitus Group LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Admiral Insurance Company
Defendant:
Vitus Group LLC, Westlake Linwood Housing Partners, LP, Westlake Linwood Housing Management LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Burton et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv13207
Plaintiff:
Jamie Burton and Lisa Burton
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jihad Adbul-Mumit v. Alexandria Hyundai, LLC
as 17-1582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIHAD ADBUL-MUMIT, MATTHEW ABEDI, MONICA ADAIR SARGENT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ALEXANDRIA HYUNDAI, LLC, BROWN'S LEESBURG HYUNDAI, LLC, BROWN'S MANASSAS HYUNDAI, LLC and others
Burton v. Toro Company, The
as 3:2016cv02173
Plaintiff:
Jamie Burton
Defendant:
Toro Company, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adbul-Mumit v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc.
as VAW/3:14-cv-00005
Plaintiff:
Jihad Adbul-Mumit , Matthew Abedi , Monica Adair Sargent and others
Defendant:
Alexandria Hyunda, LLC , Brown's Leesburg Hyundai, LLC , Brown's Manassas Hyundai, LLC and others
Burton v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv16706
Plaintiff:
Jamie Burton
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burton v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-16706
Plaintiff:
Jamie Burton
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
BURTON et al v. STRYKER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv04480
Plaintiff:
JAMIE BURTON
Defendant:
I-FLOW CORPORATION, STRYKER CORPORATION, STRYKER SALES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
