Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SULLIVAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv19540
Plaintiff:
JAMI SULLIVAN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sullivan et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2023cv00697
Plaintiff:
Jamie Sullivan and Michael J. Marotta
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Sullivan v. Geriatrx Health, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv14199
Defendant:
Geriatrx Health, LLC, Geriatrx Care, Inc. and Walter Gil, M.D.
Plaintiff:
Jamie Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Anderson v. Waterloo, Iowa et al
as 6:2015cv02071
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Anderson
Defendant:
Waterloo, Iowa , Mark Nissen , Jamie Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Nissen et al
as 6:2015cv02011
Plaintiff:
Antonio Rayshuan Evans
Defendant:
Mark Nissen, Jamie Sullivan, Matthew McGeough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Waterloo Police Department et al
as 6:2011cv02041
Plaintiff:
Edward Martin, III
Defendant:
Waterloo Police Department, Justin Brandt, Jamie Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelvin Scott v. Sonnie Potter, et al
as 11-1403
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kelvin L. Scott
Defendant - Appellee:
Sonnie Potter, Black Hawk County DHS Social Worker, Chris Hammer, Black Hawk County DHS Social Worker, Ryan Page, Black Hawk County DHS Social Worker and others
Gary v. City of Waterloo, Iowa et al
as 6:2009cv02051
Plaintiff:
Ramarez M Gary
Defendant:
City of Waterloo, Iowa, Jamie Sullivan, Black Hawk County, Iowa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Potter et al
as 6:2009cv02009
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Scott
Defendant:
Sonnie Potter, Chris Hammer, Ryan Page and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
