Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MILLER v. O.I.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANK MILLER
Defendant:
LT. O.I.C., OFFICER SLONG, JANE DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. NOVANT HEALTH et al
as 1:2023cv00974
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MARQUAVIOUS LAMAR ANDERSON
Defendant:
NOVANT HEALTH, DAVIE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, DAVIE COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT DETENTION CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIBSON v. FREEMAN
as 1:2021cv00791
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A. GIBSON, III
Defendant:
CHRIS FREEMAN, CAPTAIN SHANE BULLINS, SHERIFF SAM SCOTT PAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOMPKINS v. CLELLAND et al
as 1:2017cv00772
Plaintiff:
STUART WAYNE TOMPKINS
Defendant:
JACK CLELLAND, K. DIGGS, JANE DOE FISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv00183
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STEPHEN J. SICINSKI, KIM MCBROOM and others
Plaintiff:
LYNN DOE , ANN DOE , ELLEN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP et al v. MCCRORY et al
as 1:2013cv00658
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP , ROSANELL EATON , JOHN DOE 1 and others
Defendant:
PATRICK LLOYD MCCRORY, KIM WESTBROOK STRACH , JOSHUA B. HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00169
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
TATE v. JONES
as 1:2010cv00616
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE EDMOND TATE
Defendant:
JONES, SAMI HASAN, JENNIFER LANGLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
