Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Doe 1 et al v. The Curators of the University of Missouri
as 2:2019cv04229
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2
Defendant:
The Curators of the University of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Lee v. Corizon LLC et al
as 5:2019cv06146
Defendant:
Jane Doe 3, Tammie Christopher, Kelly Crisman and others
Plaintiff:
Kaitlin Grace Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swopes v. Bio-Medical Applications of Missouri, Inc.
as 4:2019cv00807
Defendant:
Jane Doe #2, Bio-Medical Applications of Missouri, Inc., Jane Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Donna Swopes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dudley v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 4:2019cv00757
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Costco Wholesale Corporation and Jane Doe 2
Plaintiff:
Gene E. Dudley, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woods v. Doe et al
as 6:2019cv03091
Defendant:
Holland, Welch, Terry and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seaton v. Munsterman et al
as 4:2019cv00022
Defendant:
Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 1 and Scott Munsterman
Plaintiff:
Richard A Seaton, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxfield v. City of Kansas City et al
as 4:2018cv00896
Defendant:
Unknown Open Facility, Jane Doe 1, Unknown Building and others
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Gary Maxfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia et al v. Center for Behavioral Medicine et al
as 4:2018cv00855
Defendant:
Jeanette Simmons, Jane Doe 1, Center for Behavioral Medicine and others
Plaintiff:
Teresita Linares and Daniel Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeLany v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv00567
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Sean DeLany
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zieser v. Bearden et al
as 5:2018cv06103
Defendant:
Edward Bearden, Vevia Sturm, John or Jane Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Olsen Zieser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
