Cases 1 - 10 of 10
WRIGHT v. STORM et al
as 1:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
CARLTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
STORM, JENNIFER FRENCH, R. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE 3 v. BUTLER UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2023cv01306
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 3
Defendant:
BUTLER UNIVERSITY, MICHAEL HOWELL and RALPH REIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00870
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments - Sex Discrimination
STEVENS et al v. USA DIVING, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv03015
Defendant:
JOHN WINGFIELD, INDIANA DIVING ACADEMY, INC., JOHEL RAMIREZ SUAREZ and others
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 1, AMY STEVENS and JANE DOES 3-50
Interested Party:
U.S. CENTER FOR SAFESPORT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
STURGIS v. GUST et al
as 1:2021cv02877
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS L. STURGIS
Defendant:
JUSTIN M. GUST, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDS v. GEO GROUP et al
as 1:2021cv00225
Defendant:
MOORE, FRENCH, OWENS and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY R. RICHARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDS v. THE GEO GROUP et al
as 1:2020cv02457
Defendant:
MOORE, FRENCH, OWENS and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY R. RICHARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERRY v. WEXFORD HEALTH MEDICAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2018cv01327
Plaintiff:
EARLIE BERRY, JR.
Defendant:
BARNS DOE, BRAD DOE, COLLINS DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. DALLAS et al
as 1:2013cv00731
Defendant:
MS ANGEL, EDDIE BUSS, DR COCKERELL and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN G. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
