Cases 11 - 20 of 68
Jiggets v. The Collegial Review Process et al
as 4:2023cv04081
Plaintiff:
Wesley Jiggets
Defendant:
The Collegial Review Process, Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. IDOC et al
as 1:2023cv01097
Plaintiff:
Lemar Scott
Defendant:
IDOC, Wexford Health Care, Mindi Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE 4 et al v. MAPLES et al
as 4:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 4 and JANE DOE 8
Defendant:
SCOTTIE MAPLES, DAVID LOWE, MARK MEYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01060
Plaintiff:
David Garcia
Defendant:
J Smith, . Durbin, Andrew Tilden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe 1 et al v. Musselman
as 1:2023cv01035
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 3 and others
Defendant:
Jason Musselman
Brady v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
Harley M Brady
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Rob Jeffries, DeeDee Brookhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bentz v. Manton et al
as 3:2023cv03005
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
. Manton, . Huston, M Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Dale et al
as 1:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
James E Walker
Defendant:
D Dale, C Schultz, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Sawyer et al
as 3:2022cv00632
Plaintiff:
James E. Walker
Defendant:
Sawyer, C/O Dunlap, C/O Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jane Doe 1, et al v. NorthShore University HealthSy
as 21-3242
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE 2, JANE DOE 3 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTHSHORE UNIVERSITY HEALTHSYSTEM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
