Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Puckett et al v. Unicoi County Tennessee et al
as 2:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Jerry Michael Puckett, Andrew Joseph Puckett and G.R.P.
Defendant:
Unicoi County Tennessee, City of Erwin, Tennessee, Michael Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jillson v. Medlin et al
as 3:2019cv00394
Defendant:
Oshi Medlin, Carter, John Doe (1) and others
Plaintiff:
Jonah Jillson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Knox County et al (TWP1)
as 3:2019cv00074
Defendant:
Christian Gomez, Knox County, John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ralph Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Crowe v. Pounders et al
as 2:2018cv02885
Defendant:
AWO Jones, Nurse Practitioners (2), Core Civic and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Neal Crowe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson v. Fayette County Board of Education et al
as 2:2018cv02088
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dotson
Defendant:
Fayette County Board of Education , Marlon King , Nekita Johnson and others
Miscellaneou:
Ed Pulliam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kuot v. John Doe Medical Contractor et al
as 1:2016cv00006
Plaintiff:
Gai Kuot
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Damon Hininger, President of C.C.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drone v. Andy Frain Services, Incorporated
as 2:2015cv02410
Defendant:
Andy Frain Services, Incorporated , Jane Doe No. 1, Jane Doe No. 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Diartra Drone
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
