Other Civil Rights Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 1,593
Cassidy et al v. Lee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv09724
Plaintiff: Riley Cassidy and Zachary Cromwell
Defendant: Joseph Lee, City of New York and John or Jane Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KAMDEM-OUAFFO, PHD v. COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv06623
Plaintiff: RICKY E. KAMDEM-OUAFFO, PHD
Defendant: COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY, HILL'S PET NUTRITION INC, NATURASOURCE INTERNATIONAL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARDIN v. BLOOMINGTON POLICE DEPT. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv02088
Plaintiff: PAULETTE HARDIN
Defendant: BLOOMINGTON POLICE DEPT., CHIEF MICHAEL DIEKHOFF, DET. JEFFREY ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Little v. City of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv09193
Plaintiff: Paul Little
Defendant: City of New York, Correction Officer Captain Duke Rutherford and John/Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Rivera v. City of Middletown et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2022cv08967
Plaintiff: Nicholas P. Rivera
Defendant: City of Middletown, Middletown Police Department, Police Officer with ID # 1491 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pileggi et al v. Mathias et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01315
Plaintiff: Katharine Pileggi and Anthony Pileggi
Defendant: Kim Mathias, Joette Katz, Kaela Minerly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson et al v. City and County Honolulu We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00447
Plaintiff: Marquis Johnson
Defendant: City and County Honolulu, Jacob D. Mecham, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Abdel-Fakhara v. State of Vermont
as 22-2543
Plaintiff / Appellant: Fatime Abdel-Fakhara, individually, and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, Mauricio Esteban Garcia Giraldo, individually, and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, Sylvana Carneiro Hetka, individually, and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons and others
Defendant / Appellee: State of Vermont, (including specifically, but not limited to, the State of Vermont Agency of Commerce and Community Development, the State of Vermont Department of Financial Regulation, the State of Vermont Office of the Attorney General) other Stat, David Cassetty, Susan Donegan and others
Defendant: John/Jane Does 1-10
Steven Tucker, et al v. Don Verrett, et al
as 22-16558
Plaintiff / Appellant: STEVEN LEE TUCKER, a married man
Plaintiff: GAIL TUCKER
Defendant / Appellee: DON VERRETT, In his individual and official capacity as a senior parole officer at Southern Regional Community Corrections Center, NICOLE STUDER, In her individual and official capacity as a parole manager at the Southern Regional Community Corrections Center, PAM JENSEN, In her individual and official capacity as aparole supervisor at the Southern Regional Community Corrections Center and others
Defendant: ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NICHOLAS RATKEVICH, In his individual and official capacity as a correctional officer with the Arizona Department of Corrections, at the Southern Regional Community Corrections Center, MAUREEN RODRIGUEZ, In her individual and official capacity as the Southern Regional IT Manager at the Southern Regional Community Corrections Center and others
Bull v. Erie County Sheriff Timothy B. Howard et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00766
Plaintiff: Cynthia Bull
Defendant: ERIE COUNTY SHERIFF TIMOTHY B. HOWARD, thomas Diina, Nicholas Milligan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?