Cases 11 - 20 of 155
Brikman et al v. Yehoshua et al
as 3:2021mc80272
Plaintiff:
Mayer Chaim Brikman, Rivkah Brikman and Joseph B. Wolhendler
Defendant:
Hecht S. Yehoshua, John Does 1-10 and Jane Does 1-10
Petitioner:
Twitter Inc.
Zaks v. Zaks
as 7:2021cv01771
Defendant:
JOHN 1-10 DOES, JANE DOES 1-10, Rabbi Aryeh Zaks and others
Plaintiff:
Henoch Zaks
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
GAAAYS IN SPAAACE v. JOHN DOES (1-10) et al
as 2:2020cv12412
Plaintiff:
GAAAYS IN SPAAACE
Defendant:
JANE DOES (1-10), JOHN DOES (1-10) and DOE ENTITIES (1-10)
Incorrectly Filed
as 6:2020cv00038
Defendant:
Richard Brown, Officer Lawrence Robles, Shana Opela and others
Plaintiff:
John W Harrington and Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Cardenas v. Valentine & Kebartas, LLC et al
as 5:2020cv00300
Defendant:
Valentine & Kebartas, LLC, Resurgent Capital Services, LP, John and Jane Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Gloria Cardenas
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Yoshimura v. Takahashi; et al.
as 1:2019cv00686
Defendant:
Doe Governmental Entities 1-10, Glen I Takahashi, Jane Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Yoshimura
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CADMUS v. CHECKR, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv03459
Defendant:
CHECKR, INC. and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10
Plaintiff:
RICHARD R. CADMUS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Kerley v. Hatch et al
as 1:2019mi00139
Defendant:
Torence Hatch, Larry Anderson, XYZ Companies 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Glen Kerley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Kim; et al. v. Queens Medical Center; et al.
as 1:2019cv00463
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Kim and Raymond Kim
Defendant:
CMS, Doe Limited Liability Companies 1-10, Queen's Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Reichard v. JDT Enrollment Group, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00645
Defendant:
John/Jane Does 1-10, Leighton Conroy Johnson, JD Terrero Creationz, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Delanne Reichard
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
