Cases 21 - 30 of 738
Richard Gardipee v. Brown County, et al
as 23-3121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD THOMAS GARDIPEE
Defendant / Appellee:
BROWN COUNTY, JANE AND JOHN DOES, Employees for Brown County Jail, DEPUTY YANG and others
Webb v. Whitley County, Kentucky et al
as 6:2023cv00188
Executor:
Tammy Webb
Defendant:
Whitley County, Kentucky, Brian Lawson, Sula Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Figueroa v. Doe et al
as 2:2023cv01403
Plaintiff:
Austin Figueroa
Defendant:
J Wells, Volbrecht, Jane/John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00680
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
T.B. Smith, B.J. Ravizee, M.D. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Centurion of Delaware, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01062
Plaintiff:
Millard E. Price
Defendant:
Centurion of Delaware, LLC, Vital Core, Inc., Monroe Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins v. Dutcher et al
as 6:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Kennie Hoskins
Defendant:
Robert Dutcher, Matthew Halcomb, Erica Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardipee v. Brown County et al
as 2:2023cv01122
Plaintiff:
Richard Thomas Gardipee
Defendant:
Brown County, Jane and John Does, Yang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Deacon et al
as 7:2023cv07327
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lopez
Defendant:
J. T. Deacon, 4 John Does and Jane or John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeremiah Hill v. Scott Flannery, et al
as 23-2596
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMIAH V. HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT FLANNERY, Sergeant and JANE AND JOHN DOE MEDICAL STAFF
ROBINSON v. DOE et al
as 4:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
DUSHUN D ROBINSON
Defendant:
HILL, JANE OR JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
