Cases 21 - 30 of 65
DECKARD v. EMORY et al
as 2:2019cv02001
Defendant:
DREW SALAMAN, SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP('S), PARTNERSHIP('S), CORPORATION('S), LLC('S) AND LLP('S) 1 THROUGH 15, STEVEN EMORY and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DECKARD, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BUREAU OF PROFESSIONAL COMPLIANCE OFFICE et al
as 2:2019cv00367
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BUREAU OF PROFESSIONAL COMPLIANCE OFFICE, JANE AND JOHN DOE and JOSEPH J. SILVA
Plaintiff:
GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ALI v. PAUP et al
as 2:2019cv00280
Defendant:
RACQUEL, KATAYOUN COPELAND, JOHN HOSIER and others
Plaintiff:
ANWAR SHARIF ALI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOPER v. LINK
as 2:2018cv04481
Defendant:
CYNTHIA LINK, MS. SASSANO, PETER SAAVADA and others
Plaintiff:
DENNIS COOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Robb et al
as 3:2018cv01915
Defendant:
Municipality of State College, Judge Brian K. Marshall, Centre County and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Edwin Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MYRICK v. ADIRAJU et al
as 2:2018cv03629
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN MYRICK
Defendant:
PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES, RAMESH ADIRAJU, JANE AND JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. KANE et al
as 3:2018cv00109
Plaintiff:
KELVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE , M. ROBINOWITZ , J. CHEEKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL et al
as 2:2017cv04158
Plaintiff:
AUDRETTE LEE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL, VICTORIA GESSNER, ALYNN ZERNHELT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rainey v. Spaulding et al
as 4:2016cv02288
Petitioner:
Joseph L. Rainey
Respondent:
Spaulding and Jane and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miller v. Doe et al
as 1:2016cv01611
Plaintiff:
Glenn E. Miller, Jr.
Defendant:
Jane Doe,, Jane Doe/John Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
