Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Idom v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Jared Idom
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
General Counsel SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Andrus v. Forrest County Adult Detention Center
as 2:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Jared Andrus
Defendant:
Forrest County Adult Detention Center
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrus v. Forrest County Jail
as 2:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jared Andrus
Defendant:
Forrest County Jail
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King et al v. Evans
as 5:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Dr. Lenard King and Mrs. Deborah King
Defendant:
Jared F. Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Morris v. Shelter Insurance Companies et al
as 1:2021cv00132
Plaintiff:
Brad Morris
Defendant:
Shelter Insurance Companies, Matthew Bishop Agency, LLC, Rene Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parks v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00049
Defendant:
Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Thomas A. Banks and TLC Truck Express, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jared A. Parks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Arnoult v. A-1 Sealing, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00258
Defendant:
A-1 Sealing, Inc. and Chris Brown
Plaintiff:
Jared Arnoult
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Booth et al
as 1:2018cv00193
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants A-Z, Jared Booth and City of Columbus, Mississippi
Plaintiff:
Morkiter Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arisebank et al
as 3:2018mc00225
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Arisebank, Jared Rice, Sr. and Stanley Ford
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
