Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Pickard v. The City of Sanford et al
as 6:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
William Glenn Pickard
Defendant:
The City of Sanford, The State of Florida, Phil Archer and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jason Bowen et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02146
Plaintiff:
Jason Bowen and Kelly Bowen
Defendant:
FCA US LLC, Glenn E. Thomas Dodge Chrysler Jeep and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Pickard v. Archer et al
as 6:2023cv00396
Plaintiff:
William Glenn Pickard
Defendant:
Phil Archer, Daniel Hernandez, Grant Malloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Pickard et al
as 6:2023cv00395
Defendant:
William Glenn Pickard, City of Sanford, Philip Glen Archer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Pickard v. Archer et al
as 6:2023cv00214
Defendant:
Phil Archer, Daniel Hernandez, Grant Malloy and others
Petitioner:
William Pickard
Plaintiff:
William Glenn Pickard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vasquez et al v. Reed et al
as 3:2017cv03242
Plaintiff:
Anthony Vasquez , George Woodard , Julius Sangster and others
Defendant:
Marvin Reed, Orr, Burtle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez et al v. Reed et al
as 1:2017cv04051
Plaintiff:
Anthony Vasquez , George Woodard , Julius Sangster and others
Defendant:
Marvin Reed, Orr, Burtle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bort et al v. Sims et al
as 1:2015cv00808
Plaintiff:
Brian Bort , Grzegorz Kozlowski , Caitlin McLeer and others
Defendant:
Carl Sims , Don Pinkard , R. L. Butch Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWEN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2014cv06800
Plaintiff:
JASON BOWEN
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bowen v. Reese
as 08-60022
Petitioner - Appellant:
JASON BOWEN
Respondent - Appellee:
CONSTANCE REESE, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
