Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
FTC, et al v. Jason Cardiff, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-55858
Receiver: ROBB EVANS & ASSOCIATES LLC, Temporary Receiver
Defendant: DANIELLE CADIZ, individually, AKA Danielle Walker, REDWOOD SCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, ADVANCED MENS INSTITUTE PROLONGZ LLC, a California limited liability company, DBA AMI and others
Defendant / Appellant: JASON CARDIFF, individually and as an owner, officer, director, or member of Redwood Scientific Technologies, Inc. a California corporation, et al.;
Intervenor: VPL MEDICAL, INC.
Other: JACQUES POUJADE
Plaintiff / Appellee: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
FTC v. Jason Cardiff, et al
as 20-55397
Other: JACQUES POUJADE
Defendant: DANIELLE CADIZ, individually, AKA Danielle Walker, ADVANCED MENS INSTITUTE PROLONGZ LLC, a California limited liability company, DBA AMI, REDWOOD SCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Defendant / Appellant: EUNJUNG CARDIFF, individually and as an owner, officer, director, or member of Redwood Scientific Technologies, Inc. a California corporation; Redwood Scientific Technologies, Inc. a Nevada corporation; Redwood Scientific Technologies, Inc. a Delawar, JASON CARDIFF, individually and as an owner, officer, director, or member of Redwood Scientific Technologies, Inc. a California corporation; Redwood Scientific Technologies, Inc. a Nevada corporation; Redwood Scientific Technologies, Inc. a Delaware, JASON CARDIFF, individually and as an owner, officer, director, or member of Redwood Scientific Technologies, Inc. a California corporation, et al.; and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Receiver: ROBB EVANS & ASSOCIATES LLC, Temporary Receiver
Federal Trade Commission, et al v. True Pharmastrip, Inc., et al
as 20-55066
Defendant: DANIELLE CADIZ, individually, AKA Danielle Walker, REDWOOD SCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, ADVANCED MENS INSTITUTE PROLONGZ LLC, a California limited liability company, DBA AMI and others
Other: JACQUES POUJADE
Plaintiff / Appellee: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Petitioner / Appellant: TRUE PHARMASTRIP, INC., Proposed Intervenor
FTC v. Jacques Poujade We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-56397
Defendant: DANIELLE CADIZ, individually, AKA Danielle Walker, REDWOOD SCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, ADVANCED MENS INSTITUTE PROLONGZ LLC, a California limited liability company, DBA AMI and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Appellant: JACQUES POUJADE
Federal Trade Commission v. Cardiff
as 2:2018mc51565
Undetermined: Robb Evans & Associates LLC
Defendant: Jason Cardiff
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Cardiff et al
as 6:2018mc00061
Defendant: Advanced Mens Institute Prolongz LLC, Eunjung Cardiff, Indentify, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission
Undetermined: Robb Evans & Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Federal Trade Commission v. Cardiff et al
as 2:2018mc00054
Defendant: Run Away Products LLC, Redwood Scientific Technologies Incorporated, Jason Cardiff and others
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission
Receiver: Robb Evans & Associates LLC
Federal Trade Commission v. Cardiff et al
as 0:2018mc00084
Defendant: Advanced Mens Institute Prolongz LLC, Eunjung Cardiff, Indentify, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission
Undetermined: Robb Evans & Associates LLC
Federal Trade Commission v. Cardiff et al
as 2:2018mc00847
Defendant: Jason Cardiff, Redwood Scientific Technologies Delaware, Identify and others
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission
Undetermined: Robb Evans & Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Cardiff, et al
as 4:2018mc09022
Undetermined: Robb Evans & Associates LLC
Defendant: Jason Cardiff, et al
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?