Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00861
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
RIDDLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv11601
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON RIDDLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leonard et al v. John Doe Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv05010
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, John Doe Corporation d/b/a "Consumer Recovery Services, LLC" and John Doe Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Leonard and Jason Riddle
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Riddle et al v. Oliver et al
as 3:2018cv50284
Plaintiff:
Clarissa Riddle and Jason Riddle
Defendant:
A-One Bail Bonds,LLC, Michael Oliver, Bryn Leigh Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riddle v. Georgia Department of Public Safety et al
as 1:2017cv01929
Plaintiff:
Jason Riddle
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Public Safety , Scott Allen Tarpley , Kasey Lee Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Riddle v. Capital Management Services
as 1:2014cv00414
Plaintiff:
Jason Riddle
Defendant:
Capital Management Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Parker et al v. Lawrence County Drug Task Force et al
as 2:2013cv01459
Plaintiff:
Jacob Parker , Terry McDonald , Tony Joseph and others
Defendant:
Lawrence County Drug Task Force, Lawrence County Sheriffs Dept, Gene Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
George Russell v. Wesley Altom, et al
as 12-20779
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE H. RUSSELL
Defendant - Appellee:
WESLEY ALTOM, Individually, and in his official capacity, JASON RIDDLE and ENTERGY TEXAS, INCORPORATED
Russell v. Altom et al
as 4:2010cv02511
Plaintiff:
George H Russell
Defendant:
Wesley Altom , Jean L. Sanders , David P Weeks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
