Cases 1 - 8 of 8
NELSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21522
Plaintiff:
JAY SCOTT NELSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nelson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01320
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
JAY RILEY NELSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv07347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Nelson v. Roote et al
as 9:2017cv00128
Plaintiff:
Jay Allen Nelson
Defendant:
Jennifer Roote, Nurse Tammi and Flathead County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nemmers et al v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01179
Plaintiff:
Nichole Nemmers , Jay Nelson , Nichole (I) Nemmers and others
Defendant:
Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0051
Jay A. Nelson
as 3:2016ad00132
In Re:
Jay A. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Jay Nelson, et al v. Original Smith & Wesson Busine, et al
as 10-35562
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAY DEE NELSON, SHANNON NELSON, K. Y., minors and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ORIGINAL SMITH & WESSON BUSINESS ENTITIES AND/OR CORPORATIONS, an their predecessors and successors in interest, SMITH & WESSON CORPORATION, and their predecessors and successors in interest, SMITH & WESSON HOLDING CORPORATION, an its predecessors and successors in interest and others
Nelson et al v. Original Smith & Wesson Business Entities and/or Corporations et al
as 4:2010cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jay Dee Nelson, Shannon Nelson, K. Y. and others
Defendant:
Original Smith & Wesson Business Entities and/or Corporations, Original Smith & Wesson Business Entities and/or Corporations, Smith & Wesson Corportation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
