Cases 21 - 30 of 162
Wilson, Jr. v. Stanley
as 3:2015cv01315
Defendant:
Arthur L. Stanley
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wilson, Jr.
Counter_claimant:
Arthur L. Stanley
Counter_defendant:
Timothy Wilson, Jr., St Clair County Court, C John Baracevic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Campbell v. Sharp et al
as 4:2015cv00745
Plaintiff:
Harry G Campbell, III
Defendant:
Mike Sharp, Jane Doe # 1, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Box v. Rosenstengel et al
as 4:2015cv01273
Plaintiff:
Keith Box
Defendant:
Nancy J Rosenstengel, Michael Jordan, Michael J Reagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Sharp et al
as 4:2015cv00616
Plaintiff:
Walter P Walker
Defendant:
Sheriff Mike Sharp, Jay Nixon and State of Missouri Re-Discover Mental Health Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Box v. Rosenstengel et al
as 3:2015cv03232
Plaintiff:
Keith Box
Defendant:
Nancy J Rosenstengel, Michael Jordan, Michael J Reagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belfield v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2015cv01153
Plaintiff:
Michael Gene Belfield
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Franklin County, Washington County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Box v. Webber et al
as 1:2015cv05257
Plaintiff:
Keith Darnell Box
Defendant:
E. Richard Webber, Charles A. Shaw, Lewis M. Blanton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Nixon
as 2:2015cv04147
Plaintiff:
William Billy Gene Carter
Defendant:
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Box et al v. Nixon et al
as 3:2015cv00701
Plaintiff:
Keith Box, 400 plus girlfriends/childrens mothers, Mariam Box and others
Defendant:
Jeremiah Jay Nixon, Larry Turley, Bill Ferrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Satanic Temple et al v. Jeremiah Jay Nixon et al.
as 4:2015cv00986
Plaintiff:
Mary Doe and The Satanic Temple
Defendant:
Jeremiah Jay Nixon and Chris Koster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
