Cases 1 - 10 of 5,415
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03571
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jefferson v. Beam
as 3:2024cv01790
Plaintiff:
Tyrece Jefferson
Defendant:
Captain Erik Beam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
E.J.T. v. County of Jefferson, et al.
as 24-1717
Plaintiff:
E.J.T., a minor, by and through his Conservator, InTRUSTment Northwest, Inc.
Defendant:
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, a public body, TYLER W. ANDERSON, in his individual capacity and ARJANG ARYANFARD, in his individual capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
(PC) Jefferson v. Beam
as 2:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
Tyrece Jefferson
Defendant:
Erik Beam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez de Rosales, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1379
Petitioner:
MARIA ESMERALDA MARTINEZ DE ROSALES, ISIDRO LEONEL ROSALES QUIJANO, BRYAN STEVEN ROSALES MARTINEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Epperson v. Deutsche Bank et al
as 1:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Chris Epperson
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank, Lyndon B Johnson, Hary S. Truman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Oravetz v. Jefferson County Sheriffs et al
as 6:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Mark Oravetz
Defendant:
Jefferson County Sheriffs and Washinton State MSO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
